← All sketches

Example sketch

Inspection reports without paper and retyping

The sentence it all started with

“Our technicians fill out inspection reports on paper, and someone retypes them in the office, often weeks later and with questions about the handwriting.”

An example, not a client project: we wrote the sentence, an AI drafted the concept, we edited it.

ConceptInspection and quality

Inspection Folder

Fill out inspection reports at the equipment, get them signed, and have them in the office instantly.

How we understood your problem

The report is created twice: once on paper at the equipment, once when retyped in the office. In between lie weeks in which a defect goes unnoticed. Photos sit on personal phones, signatures on carbon copies.

Interface

Workspace

Sample data Technician
Inspection

Inspection: ventilation system, Hall 2

Inspection point 7 of 18

Point
V-belt, tension
Result
defect
Severity
medium
Note
belt cracked, replace

Next

Photos for this point

Take photo

or browse

  • vbelt_01.jpg synced
  • vbelt_02.jpg waiting for signal

Inspection points

  • Filter, condition OK
  • Fan, running noise OK
  • V-belt, tension defect
  • Fire damper, trigger test open
  • Condensate drain open
Defects

Open defects

Open defects

11

2 of them severe

Report to office

4 min

previously around 3 weeks

By severity

EquipmentDefectSeveritySinceActions
Lift, Building BEmergency call not workingsevere2 days
Ventilation, Hall 2V-belt crackedmediumtoday
Heating, admin buildingPressure gauge faultymedium9 days
Gate 3Light barrier dirtyminor12 days

History: lift, Building B

  1. Mon 09:12 Defect found during inspection
  2. Mon 09:20 Operator signed off
  3. Mon 09:24 Back office notified
  4. Tue 14:00 Repair scheduled

Data model

Data model as a table
EntityFieldType
EquipmentnameText
locationText
typeText
next_inspection_dueDate
InspectionequipmentReference
dateDate
technicianText
signatureFile
completedYes/No
Inspection PointinspectionReference
textText
resultText
Defectinspection_pointReference
severityText
photoFile
resolved_onDate
Relations between the entities
FromCardinalityToRelation
Equipment1:nInspectionis inspected in
Inspection1:nInspection Pointcontains
Inspection Point1:1Defectresults in

Market value

What this problem would be worth on the market: how the product could be offered if it were sold. Not our price, and not a quote.

Billed per user per technician

  • Most likely fit

    Reports

    19 €

    per month · per technician

  • With defect list

    27 €

    per month · per technician

You pay for who inspects. The back office reads along for free.

Roadmap

  1. Stage 1

    One template

    The most common equipment type can be inspected on a tablet, with signature and PDF.

  2. Stage 2

    Defects

    Photos, severity levels and one shared list of open defects.

  3. Stage 3

    All templates

    The business maintains its own templates; inspections work offline too.

Core features

  • Inspection templatesOne checklist per equipment type, maintained by the business itself.
  • Defect with photoPhoto, severity and note attach directly to the inspection point.
  • On-site signatureThe operator signs on the tablet; the PDF is then unchangeable.
  • Works offlineFill it out in the boiler room, sync happens automatically later.
  • Open defectsOne list across all equipment, sorted by severity.

Product scope

What the first version contains, who works with it and what deliberately stays out.

Roles2

  • TechnicianWorks through inspection points on a tablet, photographs defects, gets them signed.
  • Back officeSees completed reports instantly and schedules defect repairs.

Modules3

Views

  • Inspection
  • Defects

Master data

  • Equipment

Integrations3

  • Calendar
  • Invoicing software (PDF)
  • Email sending

Build-out

  1. First version One template The most common equipment type can be inspected on a tablet, with signature and PDF.
  2. Stage 2 Defects
  3. Stage 3 All templates

Deliberately left out

  • No route planning: appointments come from the existing calendar and are just linked.
  • No invoicing: the report goes as a PDF to the existing invoicing system.
  • No free-form builder: templates consist of inspection points, nothing more is needed.

In this product: no AI

None. An inspection report is evidence; what counts is what the technician saw.

What the AI explicitly does not doNo inspection result is suggested or filled in. Empty points stay visibly empty.

Mobile and on site

The same data on the phone: for everyone who is not at a desk.

Three questions we would ask you first

  1. How many different report templates really exist today, and who changes them?

  2. Does any client require a specific format or its own forms?

  3. How long must reports be retained, and who may access them later?

A sketch, not a quote. Drafted by an AI, presented by us.